The Maryland Restorative Justice Initiative started as a four phase initiative. Our mission was, and is to advocate and promote humane and sensible criminal Justice and sentencing policies for those incarcerated long term in Maryland prisons. Our aim and objective are to advocate for policies so that individuals who have been Incarcerated for many years may receive meaningful consideration for release. We Believe that through actions of restoration, redemption and reconciliation, we can Create long-term systemic change.

The purpose of this initiative is to advocate on behalf of those serving long Term sentences so these men and women have a meaningful opportunity to regain Their freedom and become contributing members of their communities. The Initiative began in 1995 when policies changed in the Maryland Division of Correction for persons serving long term incarceration such that parole for this group Was effectively eliminated, (no one serving a parole eligible life sentence has been Paroled (out-right) since 1995) Concerned citizens, advocates, family members, and friends have advocated tirelessly throughout the years to change this policy.

In 2011 we advocated to change the policy, and sought to depoliticize parole by seeking to remove the governor from the process. Instead, legislators passed the 180 Rule, giving any setting governor 180 days to make a decision on recommendations sent to any governor's disk. Shortly after the legislation became effective in early 2012. Governor Martin O'Malley denied all of the 57 individuals serving parole eligible life sentences, citing former Governor Glendenning's "Life means Life policy. (Glendenning's no longer support this position)

In April 2012 the Unger decisions was decided affecting well over 200 people serving parole eligible life sentences, some of those denied parole in 2012 have been released under the Unger decision. (Overt 88 lifers have been released since 2013) We intends to demonstrate that those denied parole in 2012, not affected by the Unger decision are equally deserving of a meaningful opportunity of release. This is why we need your support because our mission is to seek sensible criminal justice policies, by removing the over reliance of mass incarceration, especially for those who have demonstrated that they are not a threat to public safety.

Paradigm Shift           

Two Former Governors, Robert Ehrlich, and Parris Glendenning both concur that Maryland’s parole system has become too political, and in need of reform. Mr. Glendenning instituted the ‘Life means Life’ policy, and Mr. Ehrlich commuted five (5) sentences while in office. No one serving a parole eligible life sentence has been paroled out right since 1993. Mr. Glendenning did not parole any during his 8 years in office; Mr. Ehrlich commuted 5 sentences during his 4 years in office; former governor O’Malley did not parole any during his 8 years in office, maintaining the Glendenning policy.

The Maryland parole system has not been operating according to legislative intent for over 25 years. When legislators established the parole commission, requiring the governor’s signature, there were less than 300 people serving parole eligible life sentences, and they were released in less than 20 years. There are now over 2600 people requiring a governor’s signature for release.

Two significant incidents are note worthy to understand changes in the criminal justice system landscape: Willie Horton, responsible for derailing former governor Michael Dukakis presidential bid; and Rodney Stokes, responsible for former Governors Glendenning ‘life means life’ policy in Maryland.

The statute and legislative intent functioned as intended until the Horton, and Stokes incidents: During Governor Marvin Mandel’s terms in office (1969) 92 people were paroled; during Governor Harry Hughes term in office (1979) 64 people were paroled; during Governor William Donald Schaefers term in office (1987), 25 people were paroled. No one has been paroled out right since Glendenning’s ‘Life means Life’ policy in 1993.

Legislators made an attempt to address the issue in 2011 when they passed the 180 days statute, giving any setting governor 180 days to make a decision on parole recommendation sent to the office. However, shortly after the legislation became effective, former governor O’Malley denied all the recommendation sent to his office.

Some rationales often used in denials are nature of the offense, and threat to public safety. Ironically, in 2013 people who were serving parole eligible life sentences began being released under the Unger decision by the Maryland court of appeals. This decision mandated that anyone tried by a jury trial before 1980 were entitled to new trails. Since May of 2013, over 188 people who were formerly serving parole eligible life sentences have been released. Recidivism for those released during the Mandel, Hughe, and Schaefer administrations (181) are less than 6%, and for those released under the Unger decision (188) are less then 1%.

The fiscal note for legislation introduced in 2018 to address this issue did not increase the budget; in fact it decreases it. The fiscal note also stated that in 2017 DPSCS had an intake of 52 inmates with life sentences, (35 with parole and 17 without). The intake of inmates with split life sentences was 49, a total of 111. This is just for one year of inmates coming into Maryland prisons that a governor would have to approve releases. From a fiscal perspective, any governor should be encouraging passage of legislation of this nature, as it relieves any governor of the redundancy, or a denovo of parole commissioner functions. Decisions of this nature must be in the hands of parole commissioners who are experts in this field; that use a thorough process, vetting individuals for decades or more.

The changing landscape of our criminal justice system, and the reality of those changes, the Willie Horton syndrome, (that no political figure will admit) must be acknowledged.

The current parole scheme, as it exists, has no incentive built into the system. Judge Motz once said, ‘Hope and the longing for reward lay at the heart of every human endeavor, in its absence there is no reason for anyone to change.’ The system originally had a parole expectancy built into it: Starting at maximum security, progressing to medium, minimum, prerelease, work release, family leaves, and eventually paroled. The spirit of the process has been broken.

An analogy of how it operated today, is an individual goes to college, passes all the courses, gets an excellent grade point average, and then are told they cannot graduate because the rules has changed. That is not fair, it is not just, nor is it human, and not what legislators intended with the statute. 

We must acknowledge this paradigm shift;, and start the narrative to reverse this course Maryland has taken with the criminal justice system.  Maryland has needlessly spent millions of dollars to incarcerate this aging prison population, who could live safely in the community, (as those released under the Unger decision have demonstrated) simply because of politics. Legislators are urged to consider passing legislation, and do away with this outdated parole policy.

It would have cost the state 7,144,000 dollars a year to continue to warehouse the 188 people released under the Unger decision. It has saved 35,720,000 in the 5 years since their release. It cost approximately 38,000 a year per pensioner to warehouse; at 38,000 X 2600 it cost 98,800,000 a year. The state has spent 494,000,000 in the 5 years since the Unger’s has been release.

Walter Lomax, MRJI/MEC. 1111 Park Ave. Suite 151. Baltimore. Maryland 21201: P.O. Box 33313 Baltimore, Maryland 21218,

[email protected]; [email protected]; Office Phone (443)800-1221